| should T'rul have stayed on the defiant as sub-commander? |
| yes she should have! |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
| no she shouldn't have |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Pah-Wraith
Sheikh
Joined: 30 Nov 2001
Posts: 6012
Location: Londonistan.
|
 Sun Aug 11, 2002 4:13 am Sub-commander T'rul in the episode the search |
|
apparently her character died so she was no longer assigned as the defiants cloak operator but she died in the simulation and therefore should technically be alive!
I think if they kept her in the series it would be a good addition much like enterprises T'pol
|
|
|
Defiant
Fleet Admiral
Joined: 04 Jul 2001
Posts: 15946
Location: Oregon City, OR
|
| Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:25 pm |
|
I think the DS9 crew was well enough off without a Romulan breathing down their neck the whole time. Especially like in episodes where they used the cloak in the Alpha Quadrant (they're not supposed to), then T'Rul would've busted Sisko.
|
|
|
Pah-Wraith
Sheikh
Joined: 30 Nov 2001
Posts: 6012
Location: Londonistan.
|
| Sat Sep 21, 2002 4:36 am |
|
yeah but I still beleive that a vulcan national or an attashe assigned by the Tal Shiar to the defiant would make an interesting addition 
|
|
|
Archon34
Commodore
Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 1567
Location: U.S.S. Canada rulz
|
| Mon Dec 16, 2002 10:31 pm |
|
that would have been better
|
|
|
Zefram Cochrane
Commodore
Joined: 18 Sep 2002
Posts: 1257
Location: Stafleet outpost 9876965 (aka Aberdeen,Scotland)
|
| Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:21 pm |
|
I thought she was a great contradicti0n to the typical romulan!
-------signature-------
"So your all astronauts, on some sort of...Star Trek"
|
|
|
TMara
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 05 Jan 2003
Posts: 248
Location: Vienna, Austria
|
|
|
Pah-Wraith
Sheikh
Joined: 30 Nov 2001
Posts: 6012
Location: Londonistan.
|
| Sat Feb 15, 2003 12:21 pm |
|
Yeah she was played by Martha Hackett
|
|
|
Matrix881
Captain
Joined: 19 Feb 2003
Posts: 520
|
| Fri Feb 21, 2003 11:02 pm |
|
i Know
|
|
|
|
Search
FAQ
Log in
