| What did you think of Voyager's appearance? | 
	   
	  
		
		  
			
			  | Very Nice | 
			  
				
			   | 
			   71%  | 
			  [ 27 ] | 
			 
			
			  | Pretty good, but some area for improvement | 
			  
				
			   | 
			   23%  | 
			  [ 9 ] | 
			 
			
			  | Nothing Special | 
			  
				
			   | 
			   5%  | 
			  [ 2 ] | 
			 
			
			  | Redesign the whole thing | 
			  
				
			   | 
			   0%  | 
			  [ 0 ] | 
			 
		   
		 | 
	   
	  
		| Total Votes : 38 | 
	   
	 
	 
   | 
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Puck The Texan
 
  Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
 
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:50 pm    Did you like how the U.S.S Voyager looked? | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Well?  Did you like the interior?  Exterior?  Did anyone think they could have improved somewhere?
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		craign Senior Cadet
  
  Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 20 Location: USS Voyager NCC-74656
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:05 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I loved the exterior   and the bridge. The only things i didnt like much was the captains ready room, looked... bleh. It shouldve been more like the ENT D captains RR. Wood(ish) colour etc...
 
 
But thats opinion i guess...
 
 
xxCR41Gxx
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		~Voyager Fanatic~ Super Genius
  
  Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 1787
 
  | 
		
			
				 Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:14 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I love Voyager as it is..Borg perfection! dont change a thing...
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		StarfleetCommand74656 Captain
  
  Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 653 Location: On STV
  | 
		
			
				 Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Voyager is without a doubt the best ever Trek starship. Would've liked to see the Ent-E style of bridge, though. Voyagers lighting is great
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		cmdrFelix Ensign, Junior Grade
 
  Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Posts: 30
 
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:47 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It fits the starfleet design scheme and it is cool looking. I am a little confused on why the Captain's ready room was so huge.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		KateReba fan Lieutenant Commander
  
  Joined: 07 Oct 2006 Posts: 251 Location: BC
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:00 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I liked all of it. I think the Ready Room was good b/c when you're flying in Space and it's dark outside then you would want to counterbalance it with a light interior.
 
  -------signature-------
  “Be different, stand out, and work your butt off.” -- Reba McEntire
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Leo Wyatt Sweetest Angel
  
  Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 19045 Location: Investigating A Crime Scene. What did Quark do this time?
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:54 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I liked all of it but it could use some more stuff added to it maybe. Not sure what. But it looked good.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		AndrewBullock The Misguided One
  
  Joined: 04 Jun 2004 Posts: 2112 Location: Kentucky. (North America)
  | 
		
			
				 Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:30 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I love how Voyager looks. I think they did well with it's concept.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		TrekkieMage Office Junkie
  
  Joined: 17 Oct 2004 Posts: 5335 Location: Hiding
  | 
		
			
				 Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:47 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Overall I loved it. The outside was very sleek and functional (well, I don't know about the folding nacelles...), and the inside looked comfortable without loosing functionality.
 
 
One thing I've noticed was that the Enterprise-D was way too hotel-like (80s pink! Yay!) and that the NX-01 looked like there wasn't a comfortable place to sit...Voyager was a nice compromise  
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		luit14 Commodore
  
  Joined: 19 Mar 2005 Posts: 2232 Location: Come on in HEEERE! :P
  | 
		
			
				 Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:28 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Yeah, it's probly my favorite starfleet design on the interior that I've seen. I liked DS9 better though but it was a station.   
 
 
Exterior was pretty cool too.  
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Untitled Commander
  
  Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 396 Location: abandoned
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:51 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I liked the interior, but some one once remarked that Voyager looked like a giant spoon and I have to agree.  While I think the exterior is much better than the exterior of the Enterprise (um...D is it, one from the TNG series, not the films) I think it could have been improved upon.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		~Voyager Fanatic~ Super Genius
  
  Joined: 07 May 2004 Posts: 1787
 
  | 
		
			
				 Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:03 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				When I first started watching Voyager, I though it looked bizzare especially the main deflector which at that time thought it looked like a silly face but I now am able to admire Voyager's beauty and technological sophistry.
 
  -------signature-------
   Disembodiment is the epitome of perfection...
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		StarfleetCommand74656 Captain
  
  Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 653 Location: On STV
  | 
		
			
				 Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:03 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The deflector on Voyager was the best. TNG's looked a bit ridiculous
 
In fact, the Ent- E had the best deflector
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		alxg101 Crewman
  
  Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 3
 
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:30 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				yeah i said voyager looked very nice, i think the inside more than the out... i read someones comment that said it looked a bit like a spoon, id agree i feel that voyager is a little short and stumpy and from the side looks like it has a pot belly sounds all very human i know also im not a huge fan of the moving naiselles. otherwise the interior is excellent, loved the bridge, especially the lighting and engineering, astrometrics etc are all good too.  apologies for the terrible punctuation!
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Sonic74205 Rear Admiral
  
  Joined: 01 Feb 2004 Posts: 4081 Location: England
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:02 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Yeah i liked the way voyager looked. I prefered the exterior to the interior though. The interior was nice don't get me wrong, very clean, simple and funtion just like you would expect from a starship. But seeing it over 7 years and imagening living there its not that nice...a bit generic. I liked the interior of the enterprise-D. Looked like a luxury liner, really gave it a sense of community.
 
 
I remember when i started watching voyager i always thought that when voyager was at impule the nacelles always looked a bit too small for the ship. But if you think about them being longer the ship looks odd lol. I prefer voyager at warp with the nacelles up, much better  
 
  -------signature-------
  <a href="<img>http://sonic.11.forumer.com</a>
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Founder Dominion Leader
  
  Joined: 21 Jun 2004 Posts: 12755 Location: Gamma Quadrant
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Mar 25, 2007 8:11 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. As if it's like a tiny, cute version of a starship. It doesn't looks horrible or anything. I mean, it certainly has a sleek look to it and I love that in starships, like the Enterprise-J. 
 
 
As for the interior, no, I don't. The bridge was the only "cool" part of the interior. It seems more spatious then a Galaxy class, which is ironic what with the Intrepid class being smaller.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		jonycold Junior Cadet
  
  Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 19
 
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:03 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Absolutely loved the interior, except for the shuttle bay. 
 
about the exterior, i didn't like the view of the ship from the behind that much, but upfront it looked amazing.
 
 
i LOVED when voyager goes to warp and the warp-engines do that flip thingy!
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Syzygy Senior Cadet
  
  Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 24 Location: Starfleet Academy
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:20 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | TrekkieMage wrote: | 	 		  | Overall I loved it. The outside was very sleek and functional (well, I don't know about the folding nacelles...), and the inside looked comfortable without loosing functionality. | 	  
 
 
Agree.  The folding nacelles looked jarringly angular...awkward.
 
 
Originally, the ship was to have sleek, rounded nacelles more reminiscent of the Enterprise D.  This is the improvement I would have made.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Kathryn_Janeway218 Lieutenant Commander
  
  Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 252 Location: Battlestar Arc Angel (CO)
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:48 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				VOYAGER HAD THE BEST EVERYTHING!!!
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		deltaflyer3 Lieutenant
  
  Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 137
 
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:40 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				i liked it it was a whole new design in the star trek world
 
  
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		deltaflyer3 Lieutenant
  
  Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 137
 
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:41 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Founder wrote: | 	 		  To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. As if it's like a tiny, cute version of a starship. It doesn't looks horrible or anything. I mean, it certainly has a sleek look to it and I love that in starships, like the Enterprise-J. 
 
 
As for the interior, no, I don't. The bridge was the only "cool" part of the interior. It seems more spatious then a Galaxy class, which is ironic what with the Intrepid class being smaller. | 	  
 
i think it kinda looks like a duck at a certain angle.
 
  -------signature-------
  Warning: Last chance to be a hero Doctor, get going!
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Spartan 688 Ensign
  
  Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 57
 
  | 
		 | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		calvin Lieutenant, Junior Grade
  
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 78 Location: SoCal
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:22 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Founder wrote: | 	 		  | To be honest, it's ok. People said it looks like a "spoon". I disagree, it looks more like a giant arrowhead. Honestly, that's not very appealing to me. It almost oozes "Galaxy class-lite" to me, the way Voyager looked. | 	  
 
 
the Galaxy class doesn't have that elongated, arrowhead/spoon-like saucer section. the Galaxy class's saucer section is fatter/wider than it is long, isn't it? perhaps you were thinking of the Enterprise-E, which has an elongated saucer section, though it's more of an oval than an arrowhead.
 
 
personally i like that spoon shape saucer section. the yeager has the same look as well. both are very sleek/sexy looking.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		vgrbabe Senior Cadet
  
  Joined: 19 Aug 2008 Posts: 20
 
  | 
		
			
				 Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:55 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The Intrepid Class is still my favorite ship design. It looks so sleek and fast!
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		RobertBeltranFAN Ensign
 
  Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 58
 
  | 
		
			
				 Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:23 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I wouldn't change anything about Voyager because mostly everyone likes it the way it is, and it is perfect.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		 |