| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Puck The Texan
 
  Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
 
  | 
		
			
				 Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:54 pm    Australian PM says US Congress vote on Iraq aids Al-Qaeda | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  The US Congress' vote to push for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq was wrong and will bring comfort to Al-Qaeda insurgents, Australian Prime Minister John Howard said Friday.
 
 
The Democrat-dominated US Senate on Thursday passed legislation which set a timeline for the recall of US troops from Iraq, where the US has been engaged in a bloody war since March 2003.
 
 
US President George W Bush has vowed to veto the law.
 
 
Howard, a staunch Bush supporter who has also committed troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, said the vote by the US Congress was "probably not helpful to the general situation in Iraq."  | 	  
 
 
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070427024429.z5eu5xpb&show_article=1
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
  
  Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
  | 
		
			
				 Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:10 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I've always liked the Australian Prime Minister. He and Tony Blair have been great, steadfast leaders in the War on Terror.
 
  -------signature-------
  "Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		squiggy Stooge Two
  
  Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 3007 Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:27 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I can see bush passing it if the following line is added to the bottom of the bill:
 
 
"Upon all foreign military and Allied tourist withdrawls, The United States of America will be permitted to blow the middle east to kingdom come using 1000 nuclear missiles."
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		WeAz Commodore
 
  Joined: 03 Apr 2004 Posts: 1519 Location: Where you aren't
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:13 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It's another case of, "If you do not support me without question, you help the enemy".
 
 
 	  | Quote: | 	 		  He and Tony Blair have been great, steadfast leaders in the War on Terror.
 
 
 | 	  
 
Then why do they support the war in Iraq.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Republican_Man STV's Premier Conservative
  
  Joined: 26 Mar 2004 Posts: 14823 Location: Classified
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:45 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | WeAz wrote: | 	 		   	  | Quote: | 	 		  He and Tony Blair have been great, steadfast leaders in the War on Terror.
 
 
 | 	  
 
Then why do they support the war in Iraq. | 	  
 
 
Because they realize how critical Iraq is in the greater War on Terror.
 
  -------signature-------
  "Rights are only as good as the willingness of some to exercise responsibility for those rights- Fmr. Colorado Senate Pres. John Andrews
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		PrankishSmart Rear Admiral
  
  Joined: 29 Apr 2002 Posts: 4779 Location: Hobart, Australia.
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:46 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Actually RM I’m pretty sure Aust have a lot more troops in Afghanistan right now than in Iraq because Afghanistan is seen as much more important to the 'war on terror' than Iraq.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		squiggy Stooge Two
  
  Joined: 09 Mar 2004 Posts: 3007 Location: Messing with the fabric of Video Game realities. I'll summon Shiva on you! I SWEAR!
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:23 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Depressing concept: Most of the military presence in Afganistan is CANADIAN :O
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Puck The Texan
 
  Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Posts: 5596
 
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:04 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | WeAz wrote: | 	 		  | It's another case of, "If you do not support me without question, you help the enemy". | 	  
 
 
Since when has simple support automatically been given the adjective of "unquestioned"?
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		 |