| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Commissar Sergeant-Major
 
  Joined: 04 Jan 2002 Posts: 25 Location: Texas
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Jan 07, 2002 11:46 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Plus what's up with enterprise? too many differences from established trek history. check out my posts in the enterprise forum.
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Q74656 Lieutenant, Junior Grade
  
  Joined: 01 Feb 2002 Posts: 114 Location: USS Expo NCC-79635
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Feb 08, 2002 2:30 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I don't think it's right         
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Seven's_Alter_Ego Lieutenant, Junior Grade
  
  Joined: 07 Feb 2002 Posts: 104 Location: AU Voyager's Astrometrics
  | 
		
			
				 Sun Feb 10, 2002 11:16 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				(smiles) I thought we go to the future..i personally want a Voyager movie and a new sereies after that....(sighs) I want a new series and `not` Enterprise...   
 
 
  -------signature-------
  -"There's Coffee in that Nebula!" -K. Janeway 
 
-"Fortunately, Taste is Irrelevant" -Seven (of course)
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		endgame_voyager Captain
  
  Joined: 24 Aug 2001 Posts: 708 Location: Earth Birmingham Uk
  | 
		
			
				 Mon Apr 01, 2002 8:44 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				i am so happy that i am not the only one who dilikes enterprise
 
 
  -------signature-------
  to the Journey
 
e-mail me endgamevoyager@aol.com
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Rose_218 Commodore
  
  Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 1333 Location: Earth
  | 
		
			
				 Wed Apr 17, 2002 2:40 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Star Trek is popularly known to deal with different timelines.... going back to the past is perhaps one of them. So, I guess it's okay.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Rose_218 Commodore
  
  Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 1333 Location: Earth
  | 
		
			
				 Wed Apr 17, 2002 2:52 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				But I don't really like Enterprise the much.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		6 OF 9 Rear Admiral
  
  Joined: 24 Mar 2002 Posts: 4480 Location: OKINAWA, JAPAN
  | 
		
			
				 Mon May 27, 2002 11:11 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				NEITHER DO I
 
  -------signature-------
 
  
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		Wergsy Crewman
 
  Joined: 18 Jul 2002 Posts: 1
 
  | 
		
			
				 Thu Jul 18, 2002 9:30 pm     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				   I am EXTREMELY angry about Enterprise. I think it is the worst show ever! Voyager is by far the best one so far. I think the person who had the idea of enterprise should be shot in the f*****g head. And then again. And again. And again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. And then tar and feather him. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. 
 
                                                             
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		chakotay1 Soldier of Darkness
  
  Joined: 09 Jul 2001 Posts: 11381 Location: SENTRA
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Jul 19, 2002 12:52 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				i think they should go forward rather than backwards what about yall
 
  -------signature-------
  THE SOLDIERS OF DARKNESS PROTECT THE WEAK AND DEFEND THE NEEDY
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		PrankishSmart Rear Admiral
  
  Joined: 29 Apr 2002 Posts: 4779 Location: Hobart, Australia.
  | 
		
			
				 Fri Jul 19, 2002 10:31 am     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Wergsy wrote: | 	 		     I am EXTREMELY angry about Enterprise. I think it is the worst show ever! Voyager is by far the best one so far. I think the person who had the idea of enterprise should be shot in the f*****g head. And then again. And again. And again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. Again. And then tar and feather him. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. 
 
                                                              | 	  
 
 
it seems that all the people who loved voyager hate enterprise. i dont hate ent but do bieleve that paramount should have went forward to the late 70's or early 80's of the 24 century.
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		 | 
	
	
		 |